Exploration of Medicine1
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy2
Exploration of Immunology3
Exploration of Medicine4
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy5
Exploration of Immunology6
Exploration of Medicine7
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy8
Exploration of Immunology9
Exploration of Medicine10
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy11
Exploration of Immunology12
1 |
Chao XXX |
521 points |
2 |
Re XXX |
413 points |
3 |
Jerzy XXX |
386 points |
4 |
Tracy XXX |
371 points |
5 |
Zelda XXX |
365 points |
6 |
Qiuyu XXX |
296 points |
Review Process: I find the ARES system intuitive and user-friendly, and I have no difficulty conducting the reviews. However, I would appreciate it if the flow of manuscripts available for review could be larger and more consistent.
System Features: I consider the tools provided by the system appropriate and useful.
Rewards Program: I found the points transfer process very quick and efficient. As this was my first time accumulating enough points for redemption, I do not have suggestions or complaints at this moment.
"ARES System provides a smooth and efficient peer review experience, with a user-friendly interface, flexible review timelines, and clear feedback tools that simplify the process. Its detailed review history tracking also promotes transparency and keeps reviewers actively engaged."
"This mechanism suggested by ARES system is absolutely valuable so that encourages researchers to devote their time and expertise for peer-review opportunities."
"I am highly impressed by the kind gesture of the team in rewarding Reviewers like myself for their time and effort."
Qualified reviewers should be scholars who have published peer-reviewed scientific articles in established international journals as the first or corresponding author. You will be verified as a reviewer if you meet these requirements. The verification is usually be completed within one week after a successful registration.
To ensure accurate review invitations and to save processing time, please update all the information displayed to editors, including availability for review, area of research, publications, and H index.
Reviewers with confirmed misconduct with respect to the review process will be disciplined and punished on the platform. For severe misconduct such as plagiarism, misappropriation of the author's data, breaches of confidentiality, and failure to disclosure of conflicts of interest, reviewers will be removed from the pool. The ARES system believes these behaviors violate academic practice, and such reviewers will no longer be approved as a reviewer on the ARES System (see specific disciplinary measures in Rewards and Punishments).
Qualified reviewers should be scholars who have published peer-reviewed scientific articles in established international journals as the first or corresponding author. You will be verified as a reviewer if you meet these requirements. The verification is usually be completed within one week after a successful registration.
To ensure accurate review invitations and to save processing time, please update all the information displayed to editors, including availability for review, area of research, publications, and H index.
Reviewers with confirmed misconduct with respect to the review process will be disciplined and punished on the platform. For severe misconduct such as plagiarism, misappropriation of the author's data, breaches of confidentiality, and failure to disclosure of conflicts of interest, reviewers will be removed from the pool. The ARES system believes these behaviors violate academic practice, and such reviewers will no longer be approved as a reviewer on the ARES System (see specific disciplinary measures in Rewards and Punishments).
